RSS Feed Mutual Attraction

12:04 pm | 0 recommendations | 4 comments

Careers: Unwanted Company?

| posted by Shawn Graham

Sometimes the toughest interview questions seem like the ones that should be the easiest to answer. “Based on your research, what makes us uniquely different from our competitors?” Time and time again, it amazes me how many people get tripped up by this question. It’s easier to swallow when the candidate is a newly-minted undergrad or grad student, but candidates looking to make a mid-career move are just as likely to make the same mistake.

With links to thousands of articles, databases, and the treasure trove that is the web, you’d think that everyone would be able to answer it. But most can’t. And that led me to wonder…if interviewees can’t answer the question, should you automatically disqualify them? I have a hard time wrapping my mind around this one but I usually think it does because it’s a direct reflection of a candidate’s interview acumen or lack thereof.

What could not being able to answer that question say about an interviewee?

They’re not that into the company. If they were, they would have taken the time to do their homework. Thanks to Google, there’s really no excuse not to know a little bit about the company before an interview. Typically, candidates don’t have to know the middle names of the past five CEOs or what the stock is trading at on the day of their interview, but they should have a firm grasp of what products or services you offer, who some of your key leaders are, and how your company differentiates itself from some of your top competitors. If they’re not into your company, you don’t want to hire them. Simple as that.

They don’t “get it.” Show me a company that doesn’t value common sense, and I’ll show you a company that will soon be shutting its doors. They don’t have to be the most experienced interviewees in the world to realize that they should do a little research before the interview—it’s common sense in every shape of the word. If they don’t understand that, I suggest you show them the door 1) because they might not be able to find it on their own and 2) so you can avoid having them waste any more of your time.

They’re overconfident. Because of their background, they might think they’re a lock for the job so they decide not to do any research. Again, thinking someone is going to hand them a job on their laurels says a lot about where their collective heads are…and I’d fathom a guess it’s somewhere in the clouds. Not good. Even if they think they’ll be handed the job, they should still take the time to figure out if the company and job are a good fit. Overconfident now could mean big headaches later. Next!

Nerves. This is one you can almost always forgive. We’ve all been there. We know the answer, but we let our nerves get the best of us and we freeze up. This one is easy to identify if you just come back to the question later in the interview. In most cases, those who have done their due diligence will be able to knock the question out of the park. Within reason, there’s nothing wrong with being a little nervous. However, if you ask “why our company” and an interviewee starts to hyperventilate, it’s probably a good idea to consider other candidates.

Companies are made up of people and those people typically take pride in their companies and in their jobs. We want to know that the candidates we’re hiring to join our teams share the same passion for the company and the position as we do. I’m not saying you should reject candidates who can’t tell you what makes your company unique, but I am saying that should raise a SERIOUS red flag.

Shawn Graham is an Associate Director with the MBA Career Management Center at UNC's Kenan-Flagler Business School and author of Courting Your Career: Match Yourself with the Perfect Job (courtingyourcareer.wordpress.com).

Tags: Careers

Comment

Recent Comments | 4 Total

September 24, 2007 at 1:38pm

Matt M.

Interestingly, many existing employees cannot answer this question as well. Also, most companies do not paint a very clear picture of what differentiates themselves. Both of these are clear signals to an interviewee that they should stay away. The question is equally good asked both ways.

September 25, 2007 at 2:18am

mike

SWhat about those of us that need a place to work, but are anti-corporate beauracracy? I'm in the tech field, with a resume posted on most major job sites, and you wouldn't believe how many emails a day that I get that tell me how great their company is because of how much the business makes per year, or that it is a Fortune [Fill in the blank] company. To make matters worse, the people emailing me do not read or pay attention to my resume, as it specifies a state where I am looking for work, and these people only have positions at least two states away. Or I am looking for contract work and they offer me permanent positions.

How is it that the people searching for candidates can get away with not doing THEIR research, but candidates are expected to go the extra mile?

I couldn't care less about the size/revenue of a company! The fact that the company makes money and is ranked doesn't mean anything as a potential employee [unless stock options are available], it just means that they can alter their books (DELL!!!). It used to be true that corporations offered the safety net of a pension, which even Big Blue has been tampering with.

Without a tour of the company's culture, there's no guarantee that I or anyone else would like the company. And there's no guarantee that the people I like today will be there tomorrow to continue the cultural tradition.

On the other hand, dealing with all the BS that corporations and HR expect from candidates also leads to more people becoming entrepreneurs. I'm so sick of the drama and other things that occur at the workplace (especially with 20+ employees) that I'm starting my own business.

An employee should NOT be expected to know everything about a company, but he should learn about it and believe in it along the way. When I started a job at Lowe's years ago, I was impartial to home improvement chains. Through my development of learning the different areas and specifics of home building/remodeling, I found things that made me believe in Lowe's. Two examples: Home Depot's service was crap (not to mention the orange in the store was too overpowering), and Menards, with their own saw mill, cut boards below specification. A customer who bought 5/4 deck boards from Menards came to finish his project at Lowe's, and he discovered the 5/4 boards from Menards were 1/4" thinner than the Lowe's lumber! (Of course, not noticing the difference in size until after he took his boards home and started laying them on his half-finished deck.)

September 25, 2007 at 9:28am

alex

on point matt, on point!

September 27, 2007 at 2:51pm

King Kull

Good article, but perhaps no longer reasonable. If I did as you implied, I wouldn't have anyone left to hire. Further, even Marketing grads I interview seldom have been taught or understand the practical implications of differentiation and why its important.

Like most executives I talk to, everyone wants to be everything to everyone. Then you have more customers!

Comment