RSS Feed Lip Service

10:50 am | 0 recommendations | 33 comments

Leadership: Michael Vick - Role Model for Regret

| posted by Ruth Sherman

I was struck by Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick’s recent statements, which he made last week before and after pleading guilty to felony charges of conspiracy related to running an illegal dogfighting operation.

There are many who think that no matter what Vick says now, there is no way to adequately make up for the horrendous crime he committed: the sickening abuse and killing of dogs in the pursuit of sport and gambling dollars. But they are wrong. Michael Vick can redeem himself and based on my reading and viewing of his statement, he is well on his way. Here are some of the things that Vick did that make his statement especially notable:

1. He accepted total responsibility. Vick did not blame anyone, did not roll over on anyone and did not hint at any anger at the people who may have blamed or rolled over on him.
2. He apologized. Vick mentioned the Falcons’ coach, owner and his teammates. He also directed his apology to fans, especially young fans, saying he had done something immature and needed to grow up.
3. He accepted his fate. Vick will be going to jail, perhaps for as long as a year. That is a big comedown from the heights he is accustomed to. He used the prospect of his incarceration as having “a lot of downtime” in which to consider his deeds and his future.
4. His delivery was believable. Vick did not seem rehearsed. His eyes were cast downward. His body language was closed, hands down, folded in the fig-leaf position, shoulders rounded. His voice was quiet and he seemed to not be reading from prepared text or using notes (nothing of that nature was in evidence). He seemed genuinely humbled and shaken by what had transpired. He looked and sounded ashamed.

Before I go any further, let me say I am no fan of football or big sports of any kind, especially the ones comprised of aggressive men who hurt each other for a living. Nor am I an apologist for dogfighters. I love dogs, have had several of them as pets and know how sweet they are and what great companions they can be.

To those who argue that Vick is not sincere, that he is just trying to repair his badly tarnished image so he can get back to football when he gets out of jail, I say not so fast. “What took him so long?” these people are asking. “This has been going on for years and now he sees the error of his ways? Oh please.” I understand. I am as cynical as they come and it may be true that Vick is just a good actor and a master manipulator. Truth is, we’ll never know for sure.

Nonetheless, he has put in place the right elements for a comeback. It is a bold approach although it shouldn’t be. When was the last time you heard anyone in the public eye who had done something wrong come forward with a statement as forthright and clear as Michael Vick’s? I can’t remember the last time. More often than not, such people blame others or situations out of their control. They disappear quickly into rehab. They find God. They sometimes resign and disappear for a time. They never apologize.

Apology is among the most powerful communication tools in the arsenal. It is an unparalleled defuser of highly charged situations. It persuades the most stubborn to take another look. Don’t you wish that people in business and politics would do it (and mean it) more often? I do. In fact, I crave it. I think the rest of the public does, too.

Michael Vick apologized for his crime. He did it correctly. He did it well. He is a role model for taking ownership when things go wrong. I believe it will go a long way toward softening the public’s – and perhaps the sentencing judge’s – view of him and pave the way for his eventual return. It will be interesting to see if that happens.

Ruth Sherman • Ruth Sherman Associates, LLC • Greenwich, CT • www.ruthsherman.com

Sign in or register to comment.

Recent Comments | 33 Total

September 4, 2007 at 1:26pm

Jeff
Even though public figures apologize at the drop of a hat these days, they often do a good job of avoiding responsibility, and it was good to see Vick not falling into that trap. A good first step in a long process of image rebuilding.

September 4, 2007 at 2:38pm

Va Tech Fan
Did Mike say the right things? Yes. But there is one crucial problem: Mike was not believable at all. Ruth's rebuttal above doesn't adequately respond to those who question Mike’s credibility. Maybe Ruth only read the contents of the press conference; if so, I highly recommend watching it on TV or YouTube. Mike's not a good actor, and it showed. Was Mike sorry that he was involved in bankrolling a gambling and dog fighting enterprise, or was he just sorry that he got caught in years and years of lies and deception of his teammates, the owner of his football team, and the commissioner of the NFL? The answer was painfully clear in his inarticulate, wandering, lawyer & PR written "apology".

September 4, 2007 at 3:43pm

Josh R
I thought it was a great apology. It should also be noted, that he didn't appear to have any notes. Vick had little incentive to be involved in dogfighting except that it was part of the culture of his peer group. This was a very ill advised use of his spare change. He had little motive except to be cool with his friends. I do believe his apology.

September 4, 2007 at 4:12pm

Vickki
Ruth Sherman, I am so glad to see a different view on the whole Michael Vick post. You made some very intersing points in your article. I would first like to say that I deeply believe that Michael Vick will redeem himself and was very sincere with his apology. Alot of people don't buy his public apology because they believe it wasn't presented correctly. What made that apology believalbe and acceptable in my eyes is because the man was speaking from his heart not reading what someone wanted him to say.That for Michael Vick was step one. When this man pays his debt to society I do beleive he should like anyone else be given a second chance. We are getting so many different opinions about this whole case. We all look at dogs differently some people treat them like thier kids, some have dogs for trespassing purposes, and some simply just have dogs to have them. There is so much negative media behind this case that we are forgetting that people still love and forgive this man for his actions. I for one can't wait to see him redeem himself, just hope that he is treated fairly and only time will tell.

September 4, 2007 at 4:14pm

DR2
I honestly hope he is banned from the NFL indefinitely. He clearly knew what he was doing is wrong. The guy isn't an idiot, he knew the consequences he would face if caught. Welcome to reality in my opinion.

September 4, 2007 at 5:05pm

Marc
Before you grant him sincerity, please be sure he actually wrote the words. Remember, on the day of his arraignment, he "apologized" (via lawyer) by including the sentiment that he would have preferred to be at "spring training" with his teammates. That statement was written by an intern at his lawyer's office and he never read the statement. NFL has training camp; MLB has "spring training." I hope you are right, but I would never stack my reputation by publicly hoping I was not fooled by someone that has already hidden behind false apologies. Also, remember that people that know Vick much better than myself or the Author were previously fooled about his character and thought he was sincere when he denied involvement. . .

September 4, 2007 at 5:11pm

Charles
I agree with DR2 and hope Vick is subject to everything our laws have to offer and I hope the football commissioner makes an example out of Vick and bans him from ever profiting from football. Whether he was sincere or not, who gives a flying crap; he’s just another public figure who is caught doing something illegal, but in this case, it’s not himself he was hurting, it’s defenseless animals. As a society, we need to stand up a say we’re tired of this abuse of the system from our so-called “stars”, who more times than not get away with a slap on the wrist. (Lindsey Lohan getting caught with cocaine on her person after she enters the jail and gets off with no charge; if it were you or me, we would still be in jail, but I’ll save my rant on Lindsey for another post)

September 4, 2007 at 5:12pm

Warren Nelson
I agree with Ms. Sherman, What this guy did was stupid. What he did was cruel almost beyond belief. Yet, as she pointed out, he didn't blame anyone. That would have been easy. He had certainly surrounded himself with some dopes. In reality, he didn't kill a person, and in many rather evolved cultures in the world, fighting animals, both animal on animal and man on animal are seen as entertainment. Is right, nope, not in my mind, but is it right to ban him from his chosen profession for life because of a stupid, cruel mistake? Nope. Give the guy a second chance. Let's see if he can use his "downtime" to internalize the lessons brought on by these shameful, painful incident.

September 4, 2007 at 5:28pm

Ruth Sherman
Thanks, Jeff. It will be a long process. As you will note by some of the other comments so far, other people disagree. Time will tell.

September 4, 2007 at 5:32pm

Ruth Sherman
Va Tech Fan asserts that I did not see Vick's "performance." In fact, I did watch it and note it in my post. I believe his delivery was so unpolished as to be believable. Did he have some plans as to what he would say? Probably, who wouldn't? However, his delivery (downcast eyes, closed body language, quiet voice, etc.) was entirely consistent with his statement. I did not see it as a PR stunt, though it may have been. Not in the least.

September 4, 2007 at 5:35pm

Ruth Sherman
Josh R - I certainly did notice that he didn't have any notes and make that point in the post. I don't know the man, of course, and can only guess about his peer group, but you could be right. It would begin to make sense of why such a successful man allowed himself to become involved in such an awful situation.

September 4, 2007 at 5:40pm

Ruth Sherman
Vickky, I couldn't agree with you more. What made him believable was the whole shebang -- message, delivery, all of it. I don't take a stand as to whether he should be forgiven for what he's done. As a communications expert, I can only observe and comment on what I see. What I saw was that Vick gave himself the best possible chance to recover from this debacle when the time comes. Maybe he'll go back to football, maybe not. Maybe he'll make something else of himself. Knowing how things work in the NFL, however, it wouldn't surprise me a bit if, after he serves his sentence, if he wants it, he'll be back on some team.

September 4, 2007 at 5:47pm

Ruth Sherman
DR2 - of course Vick's no idiot. However, I do think that these guys -- sports figures and celebrities in general (and I work with a lot of them) -- become very taken with themselves and lose sight of reality. They think they can't be caught or if they are, that they'll get off with a slap on the wrist. It's no wonder. Being idolized messes with one's head. That said, there are plenty of players who behave themsselves, so you're right to be angry. What he did was disgusting. If, however, CEOs can steal billions from people, sometimes even wiping out life savings and make comebacks in some form, so should Michael Vick be able to restore himself. Again, I take no stand on whether he should be allowed to return, only that he's given himself the best chance to do so through his statements and delivery.

September 4, 2007 at 5:54pm

J Ethington
Let's remember that Michael Vick originally denied having any involvement until his buddies ratted him out he knew he had to fess up. He was only sorry once he got caught.

September 4, 2007 at 7:46pm

RJ
I dont know what the fuss is all about, in a country where many other animals are killed for pleasure or food(hunting!!) fishes , deer, birds,cows, goats,chicken rats(lab animals). whats the whole issue? now we are being racist (speicist) with other animals but giving concessions to dogs?

September 4, 2007 at 8:28pm

Ruth Sherman
Marc makes some interesting points. In particular, he notes the wording of Vick's initial statement as proof that he didn't write it. This may be true. He also points out that Vick had plenty of other people fooled, implying what's to prevent him from doing it yet again. The answer is nothing is preventing him from doing it again. He may very well be a manipulative SOB. What I was trying to point out in the post is that there are good ways to apologize, ways that really resonate, things that have to happen. I think Vick largely succeeded based on what I saw and heard. I don't know whether he was sincere or not, only that it looked and sounded as such. As I said toward the end, we'll all see what happens when he gets out of the slammer.

September 4, 2007 at 8:34pm

Ruth Sherman
Charles takes issue in general with the way famous people receive favorable treatment when it comes to the law. Sad, but true. It's very unfair to the rest of us "little" people. But it's nothing new, is the way of the world and will always be thus. Ultimately, that has nothing to do with my post, which is intended to serve as an observation and breakdown of a good apology, something that's sorely lacking in our culture not only by the rich and famous but in general. I stand by my assertion that Michael Vick managed to do it right and it's powerful.

September 4, 2007 at 8:40pm

Ruth Sherman
Warren makes a wonderful point about redemption and forgiveness. He did not kill a person and although his deed was despicable, he deserves a chance to make things right. I know someone who just spent a few nights in jail for a DUI - a fine, upstanding person. (I know, I know, wouldn't have happened to a guy like Vick.) The county jail is no cakewalk. A year in prison will be very unpleasant and should be humbling for Vick, indeed. What matters is what he does from now on. Maybe he'll surprise us.

September 4, 2007 at 8:44pm

Ruth Sherman
J Ethington admonishes us to remember that Vick denied it at first. To me, that's just typically immature behavior, which he copped to. Sure, he should've acted like a man when he got caught and admitted his involvement immediately. But, c'mon, how many of us would not have lawyered up and seen how long we could escape the long arm of the law? It's human nature to run from a threat. Sometimes that nature saves us from dangerous things, sometimes it makes us look more idiotic than we already are.

September 4, 2007 at 8:48pm

Ruth Sherman
RJ puts this sorry episode in a whole, other light. Still, dogs are domesticated in this culture and many people have them as pets unlike many of the animals he listed. So we have to respect that and understand how incredibly offended they would be. Although there are probably many people who love their goat, rat, bird (I love my bird), etc.

September 4, 2007 at 9:05pm

Carlton
RJ RJ RJ. You are exacly right. See it bothers me when no one wants to talk about other animals being killed. They let people form all over Asia come to this country everyday, live here, do business here and no one says nothing about how they kill cats, dogs, rabbits, snakes, and all kinds of animals. Yeah, I said it. We eat at these peoples resturants everday and don't ever say a word. Americans kill deer, horses(when they can no longer perform up to horse racing standards)....uh huh I just struck a nerve. God forgives even if America won't, which I think they will. People just don't like because they know he'll eventually be forgiven. Forgiveness of a crime is forgiveness no matter how you try to put it. What we need to be worrying about are those people they release that are child molesters. Don't let someone's bone-headed make you lose focus on really really really serious issues.

September 4, 2007 at 10:20pm

NM
Using your logic, if Hitler had made a full apology with "believable" body language that would have led to his redemption too. Vick is about to be a convicted criminal; nothing he can do will resolve that and he must carry that for the rest of his life.

September 5, 2007 at 10:53am

John Kador
Vick's apology was almost perfect. Almost. But he left out a key piece. While he apologized for "mistakes" and bad judgment, the apology would have been more effective had he actually named the offenses for which he was apologizing. Actually naming the offenses is a clear sign that the offender understand the offense and takes responsibility for them. This Vick did not do.

September 5, 2007 at 10:59am

JP
Vick's apology wasn't believeable at all, and I'm surprised to see so many "experts" that think it was. I think the height of both his insincerity - and his arrogance - was reached when he asserted that "I'm going to turn my life over to God...because I think that's the best thing to do for now." How God might feel about being Vick's recourse "for now", I guess that's between the two of them.

September 5, 2007 at 12:17pm

Donna Karlin
Ruth...an excellent post and one to make us all think. Are we seeing the full picture? How might the media slant what it is we're seeing and will we ever know the truth of this? My question to you, as a columnist in the Leadership category, how does this relate to leadership in any way? I would hate to think Vick would be considered a leader in any way shape or form. I would love to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks!

September 5, 2007 at 12:57pm

LH
I have been keeping up on this story, and my personal opinion is that Mike Vick is sorry because he got caught and he stands to loose alot more than he has already lost.At the beginning he denied having anything to do with it,blaming it on not knowing what was going on in that house because he was not there.Then his neighbors said they saw him there quite a few times.All it would have taken was ONCE ! Then his friends all turned on him & he had no other choice but to confess. As for the apology : To me it did not look or sound sincere,he just looked like he felt like a heel and stuttered for the right things to say .So what does he add "I found God". I truely hope he has.....He will need God's love to pull him through this.He will have to say and do alot more before I believe he is "Truely Sorry " for this horrific crime against the "Pit Bull" Maybe if he does something possitive for the"Pit Bull" breed & helps to change the way they are looked at & treated I'll believe him.But it's not my place to judge....I Pray for him that God will help him to realize the harm he has done & make it right..........If it's a cultural thing as " Jamie Foxx " wants to believe than maybe Michael Vick can redeme himself by addressing this issue . He deserves to spend at the least 5 yrs in jail,and never play NFL football again.

September 5, 2007 at 12:58pm

H
Can we take a minute to remember all the "heroes" who have come before the media after being charged with beating their wives (!) and making the appropriate noises of apology? What happens to them? Nothing nearly so scathing as what has happened to Mr Vick. Frankly, women seem less important in the overall scheme of things in American media reaction than dogs which is just about as disgusting a condemnation as I can put to it. And as for the entire profession of football, where men watch other men beat each other into the ground for money, while making money on them - betting, advertising, etc - well it's all fun and games while blood is shed isn't it. Who exactly holds the high ground here anyway? There is enough hypocrisy in the entire Vick situation to go around I should think. For Vick to put to death some fighting dogs is hardly an issue in the larger picture.

September 5, 2007 at 8:04pm

Ruth Sherman
LH makes note of the fact that Vick had to have his back against the wall before confessing. As I responded in a similar comment, but that has not made it to this page, this is human nature. It would make sense to try to deny it and lawyer up and hope it would go away. Finally, however, the realization sets in that it's not going away. It's getting worse and you have to do something. We forget that Vick had a choice; he could have continued to deny it and had his day in court; he could have admitted guilt and NOT apologized; he could have apologized poorly. LH was not convinced of his sincerity. I respectfully disagree. Having seen so many celebrities and sports figures commit heinous crimes and so few face the music, Vick's apology was notable. LH is right about one thing, though, his road to redemption is bound to be a long one.

September 5, 2007 at 8:19pm

Ruth Sherman
Thanks, H, for really putting this whole episode in perspective. Clearly, however, we are moved by this story. The opinions have been stronger than I had ever expected. I think there's got to be more to it than meets the eye. Perhaps it is due to the feeling of being let down by someone who was previously idolized. (I, personally, had never heard of him, which means I'd better start reading the sports pages ;-)). Perhaps we are just all sick and tired of being disappointed by jerks we once held in high regard. Maybe it's that we hold them in such high regard in the first place and feel like fools when they mess up.

September 5, 2007 at 11:02pm

CC
The NFL and NBA(especially the NFL) makes these guys into monsters and try to take their livelyhood after they give it to them. I don't care what you say, this guy has made the NFL, Atlanta Falcons, VA Tech, and Nike a whole heck of a lot of money. I cannot believe that VA Tech fan from yesterday. Mike Vick turned that school into a national powerhouse. That goes to show you that people will love you one day and hate you the next. He has been thrust into a position that he could not handle being in, and that's the bottom line. He can be a leader after being convicted of this crime. Our former Pesident of The USA was still a leader after lying in court. And the person that referenced Hitler is an idiot. Hitler murdered millions of people and showed absolutely no remorse. Don't say dumb stuff.

September 6, 2007 at 4:59pm

Kim Huffman
So, CC, you think our former President lying in court is worse than our current President lying outside of it?...is court the arena for honesty ?, George Bush lied about WMD's, and is still president...come to think of it, he is probaby pathologically lying, not knowing the difference in lies and the truth .

September 6, 2007 at 6:31pm

Ruth Sherman
Thanks to CC for saying a couple of things that I said in some replies that haven't yet been posted, especially with regard to the Hitler reference. It is ridiculous to make the comparison. Vick is no Hitler and I don't think anything Hitler could have done in the way of apology would have redeemed him. CC's also right about another thing: the celebrity/sports business is very fickle. CC makes the point that there are many, many people in high places who have done bad things and make comebacks -- without having made the type of apology Vick did. Again, I think Vick did the right thing right -- late, but right/right.

September 19, 2007 at 3:01pm

Marc
When we get caught, we apologize. It's a move we take as humans to act upon our shame and to appeal to others for their compassion. If we do something wrong and we don't get caught, a battle rages between our ego and our conscience. Once our conscience wins, we act, proactively, to seek forgiveness from those we have wronged. True remorse is only witnessed in action prior to getting caught. Anything after the fact is a response to having been caught in the first place and an attempt to lessen the pain of shame.