RSS Feed The Fast Company Blog

1:15 pm | 0 recommendations | 3 comments

Work/Life: Why It's Work+Life "Fit," Not Balance!

| posted by Fast Company staff

Welcome to my first posting as a Fast Company blogger! In the spirit of full disclosure, if you clicked through hoping to learn how to achieve “balance,” I am afraid you will be disappointed. You see, I don’t believe there is such a thing as work/life “balance,” a concept I first discussed in the provocative October, 2004 Fast Company article by Keith Hammonds, “Balance is Bunk."

If, however, you want to join a thought-provoking dialogue that challenges the conventional wisdom about managing your work+life "fit" in a 24/7, high tech, global work reality, then you are in the right place. That’s right, I said “work+life fit,” not balance.

Why does it matter whether we call it “balance,” or “fit?” Because words have meaning. For too many of us, “balance” is a magical, yet unattainable and unsustainable, 50-50 split between our work and our personal lives. For others it's some nebulous destination out there toward which we are all traveling simultaneously. Arriving at our collective "balance," we will all hold hands and celebrate. Neither of these scenarios will ever happen which is why balance has become a deficit model or that “thing we never have.”

Our thinking must change radically. "Balance” needs to be discarded along with all of the other 20th Century, Industrial-Age concepts that no longer apply in today’s world. As long as “balance” is the objective, we won’t see the possibilities for our work and life, which brings me back to work+life “fit” and the focus of this new weekly Fast Company blog.

How is work+life "fit" different? First, work+life “fit” is about the countless potential combinations of work and life. Your unique work and personal choices and circumstances determine your "fit." In other words, it’s about what you could have, not what you don’t have. This is a subtle but important mindset shift. With “fit,” there is no right or wrong answer, just what works for you and your job at a point in time.

Second, it is a verb, not a noun. Work+life “fit” is a career management strategy that helps you adjust the boundaries around work and the rest of your life whenever you experience a personal or professional transition, both large and small. That transition will require a new set of work+life choices, or a new "fit." Small adjustments in how, when and/or where you work make a big difference, but you have to see the possibilities and know how get there before you can make a change. That’s our goal.

Work+life “fit” requires change on many levels: individually, managerially, organizationally and culturally.

For individuals, it means understanding that work+life "fit" is a career management strategy that involves meeting your employer half-way to find mutually-beneficial solutions.

For managers, it means seeing work+life and flexibility not as a “perk” reserved for a particular demographic, but as a critical business strategy for managing time and people resources in a 24/7, high tech, global work reality.

For organizations, it means clarifying the process that creates a culture and work environment that supports work+life "fit" problem-solving and conversation between manager and employee.

Finally, for the culture overall, it means starting to ask the real question, which is “How do we all work and have a life in a 24/7, high-tech, global work reality where the old work and career models no longer apply?” Work has changed and careers have changed over the past 15 years. It’s time for us to catch up.

Please join me at Fast Company every week as we tackle this challenge from all points of change, and hopefully get a little bit closer to creating a new 21st Century model of “work+life fit,” not balance.

Tags: Work/Life
Sign in or register to comment.

Recent Comments | 3 Total

October 10, 2007 at 5:36pm

Julio
Some pretty good points and I think more than a few people would benefit from that distinction but I have to say balance is still the word for me. It speaks to a broader continuum between work and play, right-brained activity and left-brained, between comfort and challenge.In my mind it speaks more to a healthy point between seemingly conflicting pieces that don't appear to fit yet truly exist on the same plane. Some of us work harder when we are at play that when we are at work. Also, balance is very much a verb. I balance my checkbook and all accounts in my life to rectify the pieces that give and take so that in the end I can be where I have set my goal of being. I suppose in the end we need to find the point where these myriad paradigms coexist -- kind of like the two sides of a scale.

October 10, 2007 at 9:02pm

Trip
Agreed. Great points. No disagreements. Rather, want to call out two observations. First, we always say Work+Life. As the balances or fit begin to change in the cultural work force i think the perception of the term "life" needs to be examined. Our "work" (24/7 or not) is part of our "life". It may not be that the two need to learn to co-exist but instead the two either need to become one, or be two seperate spaces. Naturally, if we let our life+work become one the discussion seems easy. Happy-go-lucky-white-picket-fence type stuff. However if we keep them seperate then we need to address the balance/fit discussion. Second, balance = noun? Well, not really. It, like fit, is a noun and a verb based on usage. It's contextual, so it leads down a larger path of discussion. That aside, it might be better to look at the terms both from a verb usage standpoint: balance and fit. Balancing is about keeping something the same when presented with changing situations. Fitting is about adjusting to changing situations to keep something in balance. So maybe it is "fit" becuase we can no longer hold our briefcase in one hand and golf clubs in the other and aimlessly balance the two. Instead we need to consciously align both pieces to co-exist and "fit".

October 10, 2007 at 11:09pm

bob
Was something said here? I should say, was something useful said here? Not likely, rather I read some platitudes about how high-tech life requires some high-tech strategies ... for being high-tech, I guess. It sounds an awful lot like another dose of 'who moved my cheese,' that awesome best-seller that told us not to think, but to be an entrepreneur, to go out and find some work!