RSS Feed Mutual Attraction

12:27 pm | 1 recommendation | 6 comments

Careers: Overhaul Your Job Postings

| posted by Shawn Graham

Last week a reader, Steve, responded to an issue I raised by drawing a parallel to the need for a better fax machine. Thanks, Steve. For a while I thought I was the only one who wondered why there hasn’t been one improvement to fax machines in 20 years. They still make that weird sound when the fax is being transmitted and it can still take forever for a fax to go through even though emails and phone calls are almost instantaneous. I don’t mean to call out folks working in product development, but come on people--it’s time to step up to the plate.

This week I want to talk about more than my love of fax machine enhancements. If there’s one thing I think we all enjoy, it’s the logistics of recruiting a new employee; posting job descriptions, screening resumes, interviewing, following up with candidates who weren’t selected. My department is looking to fill a newly created position and, as part of that process, we spent a considerable amount of time crafting and tweaking the job description. Because it’s one of the first touches we have with potential candidates, it’s important to think about how we’re going to market the job and our office. Based on what I’ve heard from job seekers and recruiters over the years, I’ve narrowed down what can make or break a job posting to the following:

The locationally challenged. I don’t care where you’re located, with the right marketing touch you can overcome any obstacle. For example, I grew up near Sharon, Pennsylvania—home of the world’s largest shoe store and the world’s largest candy store (am I the only one who ever wonders who verifies this stuff?) Whether your company is headquartered at the North Pole, Death Valley, or points in between, when you create your job description it’s important to focus on positive aspects of your location. For example, if you’re in an area where it snows year round, highlight how much new employees will save on air conditioning bills.

Too many/few requirements. Be specific. If you are looking for an MBA, say so. Many candidates pass over openings that don’t specify minimum educational requirements and also, on the flip side, those that list too many requirements. Take an honest look at the skills and experience candidates must possess to be successful in the position. Include nothing more or nothing less. If you’re job description is five pages long, you’re doing something wrong.

The “arbitrary years of experience” stipulation. This one always kills me. Minimum 11 years of experience required. So you’re saying someone with 10 years and 10 months of experience can’t do the job but in a mere 3 months they’ll be an expert? I know we have to set cut offs or else everyone under the sun will apply, but wouldn’t it be a better idea to focus on relevant experience and accomplishments instead of an arbitrary number?

Infinite deadlines. Candidates need a sense of urgency. Posting a position with an application deadline six months from now we’ll cost you strong candidates for two reasons; 1) because most people put off for five months what they can do today and in that time there’s a pretty good chance the opening will fall through the cracks, and 2) if they’re looking for something more immediate, the rolling application deadline will likely scare them away. Try two to four weeks.

Advertising. Depending on the scope of your search, posting openings through local media outlets might work but that should just be one part of an overall campaign. I’m becoming more and more of a fan of the job posting section of LinkedIn. A recruiter looking for referrals forwarded an opening to me last week and I was able to circulate it to colleagues in other departments quickly and easily.

Monster and CareerBuilder are okay, but most candidates I speak to feel as though applying to openings on job boards and company websites is like throwing your application into a black hole. Remember—this wouldn’t be the case if more companies would follow up with candidates to 1) acknowledge receipt of their application and 2) to let them know whether or not they were selected for an interview. Sorry, I’ll get off my soap box about the importance of following up with candidates.

Also, don’t forget about professional associations and alumni career offices at colleges and universities in your area. They generally offer low cost alternatives for advertising your openings. Plus, depending on what you’re looking for, you’re less likely to get bombarded by hundreds of applications from candidates without the right background that you would if you were posting on huge job boards.

The next time you have an opening in your organization, don’t just dust off the job description you used four years ago and throw it on a few websites. Take a subjective look at what you say from the eyes of a potential candidate and ask yourself, “if I were looking for a job right now, would this job description pique my interest?”

Shawn Graham is an Associate Director with the MBA Career Management Center at UNC's Kenan-Flagler Business School and author of Courting Your Career: Match Yourself with the Perfect Job (courtingyourcareer.wordpress.com).

Tags: Careers
Sign in or register to comment.

Recent Comments | 6 Total

August 21, 2007 at 11:35am

Chris Russell
Great insight Shawn. I would also add the Job Title is extremely important. If I see another posting entitled "Sales Executive" I'm going to cry. I recently put out a video which gives a few more best practices. I think HR dept's should start hiring copywriters to write them. I also think they should start doing audio job descriptions on sites like Jobs in Pods. These are more enaging than a typical job description.

August 22, 2007 at 3:04am

mike
This may be the view for deadlines with normal positions, but for some reason IT professionals are needed 'Immediately.' Unless I'm homeless or living with my parents (sans job), it's hard to pick up a new job ASAP-- especially if moving to a new location. Also, I wish HR people would stop posting positions ONLY to rediculous job sites like Monster.com, hotjobs.com, and careerbuilder.com. The last thing a person looking for a job needs to see is a big banner filled with their information, asking them if they want to find a school online or if they want an Army recruiter to contact them. I'm thankful that I can search a *PROFESSIONAL* job site like Dice.com, thanks to my profession as a software developer, but there are still some places where HR only knows of the ad-ridden sites. Thus, I am forced to sit through page after page of the crappy job sites in order to find work in my area (central WI). I agree with your experience arguments, though. There are several places that will only consider you with 8+ years of experience (in my field), yet that only means that those people may have become set in their ways. It's the same as politics-- companies shouldn't need someone who has done it all before, they need someone who will be able to do MORE without a biased opinion. Logical reasoning is one thing (i.e. this part didn't work before), but "I've always done it this way" is another. How GM launched the Saturn brand is an excellent example. Managers of retail outlets have been quoted as saying that they'd rather have someone who's new to sales than someone who had been in the business for years, since Saturn was to be 'A Different Kind of Company.'

August 29, 2007 at 9:48am

Dick Nepon
More on Faxes. I too was an early user of faxes. It got to the point where the technology was ahead of the delivery system. I had to disable all the error checking because the phone line introduced so much noise that my faxes would not go through. And, people would send me back a fax that went to a wrong address, as if we needed the original. People had a conceptual difficulty understanding that I still had my copy. However, you should know, that for many years people have been working on what some euphemistically call 3D-fax. Others call it teleportation. The basic idea is that you can send a digital facsimile of an object, or that you can send a set of instructionds on how to build or assemble the object. What we are talking about is mini production facilities tied to an incoming digital feed. CNC for the masses. You would no longer go to a store for a table for the kitchen. You would go on line and order it. It would be assembled/created nearby and delivered to your kitchen. If you were wealthy enough, you would have your own production mini-unit. Even cars would be built nearby. Factories will no longer be needed. Raw material will be created, not mined. Think the Jetsons and the food machine that delivered the ready to eat meal, assembled at the atomic level. Certainly this is a merge of fax and internet. People are actually working on teleportation; it has to do with uncertainty, and probabilities, and of course is funded by defense departments for obvious reasons. Researchers expect to have deliverables in twenty years, and then we have to make the moral and scientific choices about what is proper to copy. They thoughtt that Napster was a problem, imagine how this will fall out on the net. But don't think that the lowly fax has been ignored, it is just going through transitions.

August 29, 2007 at 2:16pm

mike
When I respond to a job 'ad', I'm careful to follow instructions. When a company does not evan have the curtesy to acknowledge my resume, I'm prone to push for a response, job be Damned. To me it shows arrogance and if they treat a potential employee like that, they would probably, treat an employee worse.

August 29, 2007 at 11:28pm

Justin - Dayton, OH
Good stuff Shawn. I've always wondered the same thing about Reyers and Daffins...God Bless Sharon, PA. I was born at Sharon General and lived in Hermitage for the first 10 years of my life. I also agree with you about LinkedIn...I'm using the site more and more and finding it very helpful. Thanks, Justin

November 29, 2007 at 12:48pm

brad
Good post. But the moron faxes comment by nepon takes up most of this page and is off topic & insanely weird & distracting.