RSS Feed

5:34 am | 0 recommendations | 4 comments

Structures for Unlocking Innovation and Purpose

| posted by Gautam Ghosh

What constantly makes me ponder is the discrepancy between what is needed to succeed in the new age of innovation and what our antiquated organizational structures seem to give precedence to.

We've all heard about the need to empower the individual, more focus on the right brain and lossening the focus on compliance and control.

And yet, organizations seem to stick to the bureaucratic ways of the mid 20th century when everything else seems to have changed.

Except for notable exceptions like Semco and Ideo , we don't see the organizations of the promised brave new world.

Is it because there is no promised world of work? Will there always be organizations where individual creativity will come after organizational priorities, where the "nail that stands out will be hammered in"?

Will there be a time when all of us feel meaningful and purposeful at work?

And what do we need to do to get there?

Sign in or register to comment.

Recent Comments | 4 Total

August 9, 2005 at 10:58am

Klas K.
Good questions. I believe that we will have a much more divided world with basically two types of organizations: 1) The large ones that will still need to focus on control and compliance, simply to prevent them from falling apart. 2) Smaller, flexible, innovation focused companies. The first ones will always be where the largest number of people work. But the second ones will grow in importance and be the one that creates the most value. When something, a service/product, is mature the first ones will buy the second ones. But the best ideas/products/services will never come from the large corporations. That is my guess!

August 10, 2005 at 7:00am

Himanshu Nautiyal
This is already happening with the big two in the internet space. Yahoo and Google are both buying very innovative companies left right and center. Y bought Flickr, Oddpost, collaborating with Alibaba. G bought Keyhole, Meetroduction, Dodgeball. Paul Graham has an interesting article on Klas' idea at http://www.paulgraham.com/hiring.html

August 11, 2005 at 10:07am

Olivier
Hi Gaut, It's interesting to note that organizations are living organic systems and we very often talk about their structures as if they were static like a mechanical device. Let me be the devil's advocate here! How much is it the responsibilty of the organizational structure to ignite and sustain innovation vs the individuals in those organizations themselves? Shouldn't we have people innovative and creative enough so that they can actually innovate in any kind of organizational structure? I don't think there is an ideal organizational structure that fosters innovation more than any other (they all have pro's and con's depending on what you're trying to achieve), it's how people work in that organization structure that will actually make a difference... In conclusion, don't rely too much on organizational structure changes to foster innovation. At the end, those who innovate are the individuals, no matter what organization structure they are in. You can change the structure as much as you want, you will end up with the same people at the end anyway ! Just a provocative thought! Cheers, Olivier

August 18, 2005 at 5:18am

vineet
The two kinds of organizations will always remain and always be different. Larger the organization , greater the controls....even though many organizations ceaselessly harp on the freedom provided to their employees. Quite a few of the large ones have resorted to Spin outs and Spin offs to tackle the issue. Gobbling up small enterprenurial firms is another favoured option to keep the creative juices flowing.

Special Editions?

Advertiser Links