RSS Feed The Fast Company Blog

2:33 pm | 0 recommendations | 13 comments

Marketers Just Don't Get It

| posted by Fast Company staff

If you haven't read the Thursday Styles yet, you have to check out the article by Eric Wilson about the new Calvin Klein fragrance. This article managed to make me completely nauseated from start to finish -- mega-corporate marketers are the antichrist completely clueless.

It seems that the label that once epitomized cool with ads that launched Kate Moss's emaciated provocative figure to stardom is now trying to recapture its glory with a new fragrance geared toward the millennial generation. Why my generation (born 1982 - 1995) are called the millennials is beyond me; since we grew up in the age of big hair and spandex. But that is for another blog.

Everything from how this fragrance is going to be marketed to how it is bottled to what it is called makes me dry heave. According to the Times article, Calvin Klein did their research and found this to be the case -- 20-somethings want no part of the corporate machine. So it seems I am totally in tune with my generation when I say that I don't want to be marketed to and I don't buy into big-corporate trends manufactured in a little room with no windows by 40-something balding men with no taste or sense of who I am. During this marketing research, CK even ventured into the hipster-laden borough of Brooklyn, specifically Dumbo and Williamsburg, to further show that they have no clue what they are doing. As anyone of the millennial generation will tell you, being a hipster is cool, only if you don't admit it and swear you don't actually associate with them.

But instead of calling the target demographic what they are, CK invented a whole new word for it (even trademarked the word in hopes that it will catch on.)

TECHNOSEXUALS.

Reading this word made my skin crawl. One source in the article said, "I just imagine kids putting on cologne to sit behind their computers. That’s really weird." All I have to say is weird does not cut it. This word evokes images of some totally bizarre sexual behavior with computers -- it would be a more appropriate label for some creepy, cyber stalker who chats up teenage girls 20 years their junior on MySpace.

All of these problems and I haven't even mentioned the name of the fragrance yet. Calvin Klein's new fragrance is going to be called CK in2u -- a poor attempt at connecting with the millennial generation and our love of text messaging. While I send more texts than I make phone calls, I have never typed that phrase until now; actually, like most of my peers, my texts are completely grammatically correct and fully written out. CK in2u only brings up awkward reminders of my parents trying to relate to me by saying things like "rad" and "gnarly."

So what lesson can all corporate brands learn from this? Should has-been labels try marketing to a demographic that they don't understand? When will they learn that us milliennials just want them to give it to us straight?

Comment

Recent Comments | 13 Total

March 8, 2007 at 5:21pm

rogder fulter

reminds me of a 3 decasde old Playboy cartoon of a guy on a photo set with an ad guy shooting his promo pic. The bored fotog setting the light meter over a partially nude blonde female squatting over a filled doggy bowl of food. The captiom reads, " you're gonna sell one h(*E of a lot of dog food, Sam."
So what else is new?

March 9, 2007 at 1:12am

Terry

I get the rage against Madison Avenue hype. But, your parents most likely used the words "rad" and "gnarly" when they were your age. People can relate regardless of what generation Madison Avenue has assigned.

March 9, 2007 at 3:12am

gianandrea facchini

this is pure crap.
but probably it will sell: not to the real cool people but to the vast amount of wannabe.

March 9, 2007 at 7:05am

crowd

LOL u r 2 funE!

Seriously though, Madison Ave thrives because there are still the masses that will follow. The flickering god that adorns the TV stand (now it adorns the desktop as well) tells the masses what they need to do. A great number of them will do it.

Turn on a radio and you will hear the songs that the Machine tells you are cool, hip, or (ACK!) hott! Those bands are selling cd's by the truckload despite being mediocre bands (at best).

TV shows that kowtow to the masses and are hyped by the right hype machines, are hits, while critically acclaimed shows that are ignored by the marketing people fall to the way side.

Marketers may seem out of the loop, but, they are successful because they know how to move the masses.

March 9, 2007 at 1:01pm

Liz Khoo

CK in2u... oh good lord. I think Calvin Klein really missed their mark with this one. CK, whoever's doing your research, you need to fire them.

With a name like that and ad campaign of hipsters, this fragrance will probably appeal to 12-14 year olds who also buy Olsen twins beauty products in the aisle of Wal-mart. Not a bad audience to target, but clearly not CK's intention.

January 10, 2008 at 4:03pm

Erling Andersen

Hehe, good read. I completely agree with you; Calvin Klein missed the target with this campaign. I hear it doesn't sell well either; perhaps a sign that you're right?

Read this:
http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/03/12/style/fcalvin.php

Quote:
"The CK in2u bottle, designed by Stephen Burks, is made from the same materials — white plastic and glass — recognizable in an iPod. (Fabien Baron designed the original bottle.) The name is written in the shorthand of an instant message, a casual invitation to sex so immediate as to imply there was no time to spell it out: "in to you.""

Wut? Seriously - wut? iPod? Technosexual? in2u? This is a mid-life crysis talking.

February 5, 2008 at 8:15pm

kistov

February 5, 2008 at 8:16pm

kistov

February 6, 2008 at 2:45pm

kistov

http://index1.chasehunt.com >winter olympics of 1972

February 6, 2008 at 2:45pm

kistov

http://index1.chasehunt.com >winter olympics of 1972

Comment

Advertiser Links